De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

THEY WEREN'T FREE IN VEGAS

10/10/2017

 
Vol 12, Issue 11

TIMOTHY SARDER

​The immediate, visceral reactions I felt upon hearing of the recent deadly Vegas mass shooting  included shock, anger and sadness. And yet, in spite of the horror; a singular, positive spark – as an Australian, I felt grateful.
Picture
Grateful, because we live in a country where within 12 days of our deadliest mass shooting in 1996 our government passed heavy restrictions on semi-automatic and automatic weapons. Grateful, because when you and I heard the news about Vegas, we didn’t feel the fear that we, too, are especially likely to be a statistic in a mass shooting like that. Grateful, that in our country, a misunderstood Second Amendment isn’t trotted out to re-ignite the same lazy debate over and over again, causing no change, until the next shooting. Jim Jefferies has expressed it better than I ever could – if they didn’t tighten things up after Sandy Hook; will they ever?

We live in an era where any major newsworthy event results in not just reporting but a flurry of click-bait think-pieces demanding that you pick a side (tribe). Look at Hugh Hefner’s death; you need to make a decision on whether you think he was a “oppressor” or a “liberator”. On the Vegas shooting, you have to have a view on whether we should call the perpetrator a “terrorist”, or a “lone wolf”, or whether mental illness is relevant to the debate. The gun control debate, too, is framed appositionally as an issue of freedom vs. safety.

To the extent that De Minimis plays any role in such a reactive culture, we can do better than demanding you pick what side (read: tribe) we align ourselves with on an issue. It’s both more interesting, and more helpful, to consider whether the binaries before us are really correct. Freedom vs. safety? It’s the same old dichotomy that goes far beyond gun control. Freedom, somehow, has become accepted as the bread-and-butter of the political right (read: tribe) while the left has effectively thrown up their hands and let them have it.

Everyone appears to have accepted that’s where the debate lies: gun control – do we “give up” freedom to own guns to be safer? Healthcare, social security – do we have freedom to keep our own profits, or “impinge” it with more taxation to better fund these services and provide for the sick and the vulnerable?  Do we have the freedom to say whatever we want or do we “reduce” our capacity to speak our mind with laws like s18C?

What rings ultimately hollow about all of these dichotomies, is that as much as one man’s trash is another man’s treasure, one of our freedoms might just be another’s terror. We are freer to participate in public life when we can attend a concert with no fear that we might be gunned down in a mass shooting, because of the laws we have in place. Someone who has a debilitating condition treated by the public healthcare system, or someone in poverty who has increased opportunity in life due to the support of a social safety net, has far more freedom in their existence than the scenario where they are left to suffer without that assistance. And if 18C does indeed reduce racial vilification, then ethnic minorities are freer to go about their lives without being abused for something that they have no control over (where they come from).

I don’t want the kind of freedom that leaves 59 dead, 489 injured, and friends, family and the nation of the victims grieving with trauma that might never be repaired. I want the freedom for us all to lead happy, fulfilling and less threatened lives. And increasingly, the pursuit of that seems to require leaving ‘freedom’ by the way-side in political debate, lest it lose any shred of meaning it might have left, and continue to do more harm than good.

​Timothy Sarder is a third-year JD student and the Managing Editor of  De Minimis

More articles by this author:
  • What Does it Mean to be a Postgraduate Student
  • What the Fair Work Penalty Rates Decision Means for Melbourne Law School
  • The 'Normal' Finishing Time
  • Should Law Students Care About UMSU
  • Input Not Recognised: Biracial Identity

The rest of this issue:
  • Women's Portfolio Year in Review
  • The Demise of Critical Thinking at MLS
  • It's Only Recently I've Felt Inadequate
  • Does Collusion Have an MLS Problem?


NPJ
10/10/2017 03:40:03 pm

They already wrote a song about this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVkTmnJkAN8

Anon
10/10/2017 10:59:29 pm

Bad cases make bad law. The so-called mass shooting the US have suffered form a small fraction of line per cent of firearm homicides. Thus, basing US firearms laws on mass shootings is unlikely to address the key issues.
Consolidated measures addressing gang violence, drugs, and mental health could achieve tangible outcomes in terms of reduced homicides.
Importantly, citizens' right to bear arms is seen as inalienable by a narrow majority of Americans. Whilst socialists, including the author, can never grasp the concept that citizens can possess the means to violently resist tyrannical government (probably because their model of government relies on State violence). Safety and freedom can coexist. All that's needed is a reduction in sanctimonious virtue signalling by false experts and a bit of pragmatic cooperation.


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12