De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

IT'S ONLY RECENTLY I'VE FELT INADEQUATE

10/10/2017

 
Vol 12, Issue 11

ANONYMOUS

During the mid-semester break I was approached by a friend from De Minimis to write something for last week’s Women's Edition. I declined this invitation citing my belief that I did not think a special edition was needed just for women, or if there was to be a women's issue I would hope we would have a corresponding men's issue. ​
Picture
I am proud that female students are in the majority at MLS and during my time here have been well represented on student bodies such as the LSS. However, what we need to realise is representation does not equal recognition or equality, something that has really hit home to me recently. With that in mind I think it is profoundly important that De Minimis sets aside editions for males, females, people of colour etc. so that a body of work can be presented to the student body at a single time that says these issues are important and deserve our unreserved attention.

As an ambitious female I have rarely until recently felt inadequate purely for being a female, this is despite being in many male dominated environments throughout high school, undergraduate study and the workplace. However, most recently I have witnessed, and been a subject to, a culture perpetuated by some male students at this law school who I can only assume are intimidated and scared by the intelligence of their female counterparts.

During this semester many students have been busily applying for Clerkships and Internships. This is a stressful time where students are busily refreshing their emails, preparing for interviews and checking that Whirlpool Forum. Trolls on a forum was one thing I expected, however witnessing students belittle and play one another off against each other is something despicable and ought to be frowned upon. Unfortunately, this behaviour has taken place right here in MLS.

Whilst the perpetrators could be either male or female and the victim either male or female, I have specifically witnessed male students making female students feel unnecessarily anxious, uncomfortable and left questioning their self-worth throughout this process.

I have witnessed male students make demeaning comments about what female students wear to networking events, disparaging women in the course and demeaning them as lesser. Speaking with friends, I’ve come to realise that many of us have experienced male peers in the cohort specifically commenting on the performance and behaviour of female students in a way that they would not other men, with many of the comments turning out to be inaccurate and seemingly made to make those female students feel inadequate and unsuccessful. That is, instead of accepting their own shortcomings, these students sought to sabotage the hopes of others, particularly of female students. I do not purport to claim this behaviour is explicitly targeted by males at females, however the instances I have been privy to unfortunately share this feature.
At the same time, I have found great support amongst male friends who have stood up to those who have behaved unacceptably and have supported and encouraged myself and others to call out these people.

Whilst the scenarios I describe above are limited, law school is tough, and we don’t need people going out of their way to make life more difficult for others. I want to take this opportunity to remind us all that we have a collective duty to do our best to stand up to comments and behaviours designed to make others feel inferior. Whether it be a group assignment, an LSS Competition, sports team, club or society, all comments that are misogynistic, homophobic or otherwise designed to hurt, should not be tolerated. We have a collective duty to ensure people at this law school feel safe and comfortable, as no amount of safe spaces or student welfare services will help if we are too afraid to confront the issue head on and call these people out.

This is the work of a JD student


More articles like this
  • What the Hell Do We Do About It?

The rest of this issue:
  • They Weren't Free in Vegas
  • Women's Portfolio Year in Review
  • The Demise of Critical Thinking at MLS​
  • Does Collusion Have an MLS Problem?
Anon
10/10/2017 06:17:00 pm

so who was it


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12