De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

The 'Normal' Finishing Time

3/10/2016

 
TIM SARDER
Volume 10, Issue 10
You’ve booked in a course planning meeting.
When you arrive at the appointment for the now-centralised service, you find another Unimelb student – who you can’t guarantee has ever set foot in 185 Pelham St – waiting as your advisor. She thanks you for coming in, and tells you that just she was just ‘catching up on the law course structure’.

It is midway through second semester first year. You’ve already pushed the Torts intensive back to November. You’ll later discover this was a sound choice, as the enthusiasm of Brad Jessup will make you greatly enjoy the subject, taking the sting out of being back in a classroom less than a few weeks after your Semester 2 exams.

With having to balance your classes with paid work to get by and other responsibilities (a challenge indeed), you’ve found that even doing three classes is a significant enough commitment that doing four sounds like a nightmare – you can’t imagine someone in your circumstances maintaining their sanity if they attempted it (for any JD students reading this who have lived out of home for the duration of their degree, worked to support themselves and have done four subjects a Semester and will finish in three years; I admire your resolve, time management and balls, but am not sure that it is worth it).

You tell the course planner that you want to extend. She takes you through what your timetable might look like for the next couple of years, and explains that extending is as simple as not enrolling for a full load that Semester – there’s no magical ‘Extend’ button to click, or special permission you need to receive. She tells you, along with Torts, you’ll have to do at least one more intensive if you never want to do more than three subjects at a time.

She tells you ‘more than half of law students don’t finish in three years’. You take her word for it, but wonder where she got the statistic.

You check whether you are still eligible to receive Centrelink if you extend. You find out that you can receive Youth Allowance for one semester over ‘the minimum time it would normally take to complete the course’. While you understand the basic maths of 3 years + 1 semester means that at maximum, they will provide support for 3.5 years – and not 4 - you query whether the more operative word in that sentence is ‘minimum’ or ‘normally’. If a majority of students extend, is 3 still the normal finishing time? Sure, it’s the default. But technically the minimum is 2.5 years, for the speed demons out there.

While the JD Course does advertise its flexible course options on their website, three years is the ‘standard’ one. And nowhere are statistics made available about how many students will take a longer period of time to finish their degree – many students who extend did not initially intend to. It would not be in the interests of marketing to tell students who have just spent at least three years in an undergraduate degree that they’re going to be more than doubling their entire time at university by the time they finish their JD.

In the midst of pursuing another legal opportunity, you will let one of your subjects fall by the wayside. You will fail it and repeat it next year, and it will mean that you will have to do another intensive at some point to stay on track to finish in 3.5 years. Although intensives will end up being some of your best marks and most enjoyable learning experiences, it will suck to have to give up a further break that you could have used to do paid work – or indeed, do what a student who has been burnt out to the point of failing needs the most – take a holiday.

You will, later, sit in a lecture. The lecturer will, in describing time commitments and study planning, remind the class that this is a ‘full-time course’. They will incredulously ask the class whether the university ‘even allows students to take on part-time work’ during Semester. You will – despite liking the teacher and enjoying their classes – feel those comments come down from an ivory tower that has no understanding of the student experience, at least your experience. You feel alienated, because you know you couldn’t do the course if you didn’t work. But you say nothing, and the day winds on.

Tim Sarder is a second-year JD student
Picture
The rest of this week's issue:
  • The Psychology of Climate Change Denial
  • A Monkey In Silk Is A Monkey No Less: A Reply to the Critics
  • On the Other Side of the Keyboard the Problem of Anonymous Commenting
  • MLS Diversity Problem More Than Just Racism
  • The Hiatus and Why We Should Embrace It
  • Forget Corporate Law, You Can Be A Space Lawyer
More articles like this:
  • What Does it Mean to Be a Postgrad Student?
  • Time is Money: Fear of the Word "Class"
Sarah
4/10/2016 09:10:50 pm

While I do agree with almost all of these points raised here, I don't think I agree on saying whether or not it is "worth it" to finish in three years despite having to support yourself living out of home. Full disclaimer that I am lucky enough to still have my parents' financial support, but I know of several people who are in that exact situation described above and finishing in three years. I think we have enough small existential crises about our chosen paths without fellow students passing judgment on whether or not our time has been well spent, as individuals with our own set of circumstances. That being said, I do agree with the general tenor of the article, but just wanted to make that note.

Tim
4/10/2016 10:15:13 pm

I think in the particular sentence that you've picked out which I wrote in brackets, I tried to express too much in too few words.

My intent was to say that most students who receive little or no financial support from family, but live out home and support themselves through paid work and Centrelink, would struggle more to do four subjects than other student s who do not fall into that category.

However, there are as you mentioned students of that kind who have done four subjects at a time and intend to finish in three years. I made that comment to acknowledge them, and also to express a degree of respect, as it is a challenging path to take in an already challenging course.

The result of being a challenging path is that it exposes students to higher risk of burnouts and clashes with depression and anxiety. This is what I mean by being "worth it" - it wasn't a judgement about whether they are spending their time 'correctly' but a genuine concern for the wellbeing of students who feel pushed to finish in three years no matter the cost to themselves. A mix of internal and external factors will make this less of an issue for those students, and if those students are confident in their choice, it is by no means my intent to dissuade them.

S
4/10/2016 11:31:41 pm

Glad to hear and to have that clarified.

Katy Hampson
5/10/2016 06:32:08 pm

I was doing 4 subjects as soon as I can and was on track to finish in time...until illness got worse! You basically can't do 4 subjects and be sick as well. Still have 1 subject to go after this semester, its a pickle. I just want to say that no-one should feel bad for not finishing "on time". Life gets in the way and with the amount of work experience and stuff we are supposed to be getting its a pretty hard slog even if you are fit as a fiddle. Keep up the good work :)


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12