De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

I'mma Let You Finish: On Being Interrupted

8/8/2017

 
Vol 12, Issue 3

ALICE KENNEDY

​
Last year I was sitting in a lecture, having a chat during the break. “Did you know that Lecturer X interrupts female students more than male students?” My classmate had been keeping a tally for a number of weeks.

At first I thought nothing of it. And then I started paying attention – not just in that subject, but all of them. I also started speaking to other students. It seemed that sometimes the interruptions made sense in context. More on that later. But often they did not. I asked myself: why was it necessary to interrupt female students who were clearly on the right track and on the way to the end of a sentence?
Picture
THE FACTS - BRIEFLY
That women are interrupted during lectures is unsurprising. My classmate’s tally and my own observations admittedly comprise a very small and unscientific sample. However, both our anecdotal perceptions correlate with a bigger picture that is being documented  and reported upon. Women are simply interrupted more often than men. And, mostly, by men. See this US Study, this Australian PhD thesis and media coverage here, here, here and here. Admittedly, that last link is Penny Wong shutting down Senator Ian Macdonald. But frankly, it is gold.

It is worth pointing out that not all variables have been accounted for. I have yet to find a study on the impact of lecturers’ interruptions on women in universities. And perhaps at MLS, interruptions from lecturers actually affect all students.

So please feel free to take these studies and observations with a grain of salt. But, I would encourage you not to discount the issue of interruptions to the extent that it affects female students.

WHY DOES IT MATTER?
Chiefly because being able to contribute to discussions and overcome interruption pays dividends along the line. In a professional environment, women who can overcome interruptions can float an idea or share insights in their entirety without someone else taking credit for their contributions. Or shutting them down. As a consequence, women who are listened to are acknowledged as valuable members of the workplace, rather than being ignored. At least that’s the theory, presuming it’s possible to overcome the Smart but Mouthy / Likeable but Invisible dichotomy. But that’s a story for another day.

At university, women need opportunities to test their ideas and to practice speaking to prepare themselves for this reality. When women are chosen to speak as frequently as their male counterparts, they are given this opportunity. When lecturers do not interrupt, women feel valued and learn to communicate with confidence. They might be wrong. Way, way wrong. They might need to clarify their thinking, aided by further questioning. But they will be heard.

ADDRESSING THE ISSUE
Undoubtedly, women at MLS have a role to play, as communication is a two way street. One way or another, we need to find the courage to put up our hands, and say: “EXCUSE ME.” These words may be delivered with what resembles a desperate screech at first, but they are powerful. Despite feelings of self-doubt, (Am I a harpy? Am I being oversensitive?) we can command attention and reorient the conversation. Better yet, if in and beyond the classroom we bypass the ‘excuse me’ and simply continue speaking in spite of the interruption, it will become very clear we still have something to say. Now is the time to start practicing, both in class and during social interactions. The fact is, we are approaching professional environments full of big personalities and loud voices. We might as well get used to asserting ourselves in a world that is progressive, but far from perfect.

As for the lecturers? It would be appropriate at this moment to disclose that I have noticed it is mostly male lecturers who interrupt, though I have observed female lecturers do so from time to time. It is also prudent to mention that I think these interruptions are unintentional, and that respect for all students is the norm. But there is always room for improvement, to build on the high quality of education we already receive.

A part of me doesn’t want lecturers to stop interrupting. Given what I have already said, students probably need the challenge. And, frankly, there are times when students are off-track, confused, or need to be rescued from a horrendously awkward pause. Sometimes, an interruption can be empowering. My favourite memory is of a female lecturer who regularly interjected when students spoke and said: “Can you say that again? But say it louder.”  Once more, with feeling!

I am also aware that getting students to speak up at all can be difficult. Generally, experiments in (oh horror) cold calling and using the (dreaded) Socratic Method meet with resistance.

But I’m also conscious that there are students who will benefit from a more patient ear. For this reason, and the others I have outlined,  it would help for lecturers to place a priority on listening more, and on actively encouraging women to speak in lectures.

Let me end by leaving female students with an anecdote, in case some of  you are wondering whether anyone will have your back out there in a world full of interruptions.

Earlier this year, I was listening to a trusts case about a mosque unfold in the Supreme Court. A male and a female barrister were standing side by side. That was the problem, actually. Instead of waiting patiently for the female barrister to finish, the male barrister repeatedly popped up to interrupt her. To the female barrister’s credit she was unintimidated and merely cocked her head to the side, bemused but unflustered.

I tutted mentally at the discourtesy of it all. Moments later, I was surprised to hear actual tutting coming from somewhere. Fortunately, the sound hadn’t come from me. In fact, it came from the judge, accompanied by a firm statement: “We do not generally interrupt our colleagues.” The male barrister blustered a little, but resumed his place at this reminder.
​

I looked down, grinned, and added a mark to my own mental tally.

We’ve got this.


​Alice Kennedy is a third-year JD student

More articles like this
  • The Hidden Gender of Law
​
The rest of this issue
  • Accessibility at MLS
  • Assisted Dying and Rights Progression
  • Equity Uncle: Textbook Prices
  • Whispers
  • Paths of Glory ​
Ellie
8/8/2017 08:22:47 pm

I didn't believe that this was a thing either until I actually took the time to note how often female students were interrupted

Also, female students seem to speak so much less than male students yet so many of them know the content better than the people who speak the most

I'm guessing that someone will eventually comment on this saying 'speak more then! don't let people interrupt you!' or deny that the issue exists at all, but hopefully those people can sit back and listen in their next class and see what we are talking about

Thanks for writing this article!

why overvalue speaking?
8/8/2017 09:31:02 pm

Some people learn by speaking and having interactions, its unsurprising that those who open their mouths more might know less

wow
9/8/2017 06:59:57 pm

Who knew muteness was the sign of a great intellect? The more you know. I truly miss the silent era, a golden time of cinema

not an mra but will probably be labelled one c'est la vie
8/8/2017 08:29:40 pm

I've seen lecturers who interrupt male students more than female students as well. I'm not trying to say that this means it is equal or worse for guys, I can agree that if someone actually did a quantitative study on aggregate women would probably be interrupted more across all lecturers. Can't tell if this is intentional or not. It's an impolite thing to do with someone of any gender.

I do think the solution with regard to women speaking less is just for them to speak up more, though... but I understand why that's a reductive point. Does the conversation need to start with identifying the reasons why women feel they can't/shouldn't speak in the first place? What do you think they are?

Alice Kennedy
8/8/2017 11:22:38 pm

Hullo. Firstly, I don't think you're an MRA at all. Actually, I think these are good points, although I would still say that there is genuinely an issue, and that effort that has to be made on both sides (i.e. by lecturers and students). Further study would be helpful to give greater weight to what I said.

I don't have answers ready to your other questions, but I think they would make good material for another article, or a chat over coffee. If you'd like to get in contact via student email, feel free to do so.

non-MRA back again
9/8/2017 07:01:48 pm

I'm tragically allergic to caffeine and intense conversation so I'll have to decline. Perhaps someone other than us can take up the mantle and answer why women are nervous to speak. Nice article and i'm glad you don't think I'm an MRA

NPJ
8/8/2017 10:57:09 pm

While I don't believe students should speak during their lectures, because that's what they are, I find this really interesting and hope it takes off.

Legit this is a microagression that leads to lower numbers of women in the profession and should be stamped out.

Thankfully, there is a large number of staff who read this and will hopefully take it to heart, needless to say I will signal boost as required.

Related : apparently there's a barista that only says have a nice day to the ladies that take his coffee.

Alice Kennedy
8/8/2017 11:06:46 pm

Thank you for your comments Nicholas Parry Jones - your commitment to feminism and the empowerment of women is renowned.

NPJ
9/8/2017 09:32:22 am

https://imgur.com/gallery/vztc6Bw


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12