De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

Keep Calling me Person of Colour

16/5/2017

 
ASAD KASIM-KHAN

​Vol 11, Issue 11

If like me, you have no choice but to display your ethnicity by the colour of your skin, texture of your hair and physicality of your body, it’s no secret that how you look alters society’s perceptions of who you are. Race is undoubtedly a part of the judgements we make of others which apparently happen in one-tenth of a second. We know these race biases exist.
Picture
Ideally, character rather than colour would have bearing on how we are seen in the world. Ideally, firms, universities, and other institutions wouldn’t have to consciously get more PoC. In reality, trying to ignore difference is ignoring the problem. An example is US university admissions. When race-based affirmative action was banned in several states, selective universities declined significantly in their share of minority-ethnic students. Ignoring race simply means that POC are forced to play laggard as whites preference other whites. Those who misguidedly call the increased focus on race identity “tribalism” miss the point: if we don’t stick together, POC are simply erased from the agenda.

Few would argue that it wouldn’t be disastrous for the First Australians if we were to remove measures to increase Indigenous student representation at universities. Grouping Indigenous people together is not divisive. It helps advance the prosperity of individuals and communities. It should go without saying that Indigenous heritage is but one facet of a person’s identity, just as a white person’s race is not their entire identity. Yet POC generally must deal with having their race seen as the major aspect of their identity. Banding together empowers us to tackle the challenges of racism, of which being perceived as primarily non-white is a symptom. PoC solidarity is in fact empowering and ditching it would be to the detriment of all minorities.

The onus for recognising PoC as humans worthy of respect must be on whites. By banding together we are more likely to achieve this. If we are seen as the same, as simply non-white because of this, that fault lies squarely with the white person. Arguing that solidarity is the cause of racism and our being singularly seen as our race is as nonsensical as arguing that individual factory workers are worse-off in the face of offshoring if they join unions.

While I agree it is problematic when the experiences of PoC are heaped together, no credible person argues that feminism is somehow detrimental the woman individual. Advancing women on-the-whole advances the plight of individual women. The same can be said for race. Yes, different ethnic groups have different needs to achieve equality, much like individuals within groups, but when entire communities advance, so too do individuals.

Similarly, by swapping the word “gay,” for “queer,” as an all inclusive term for all members of the LGBTI community, minority groups (like the transgender community) were able to join in on the larger “gay rights” movement, and have their otherwise ignored voices heard. Solidarity provides visibility, and it is the responsibility of every queer person to maintain this solidarity so the horribly treated transgender members of our society are not left behind.


We PoC have the same responsibility. Regardless of how well the terminology – PoC or queer – fits with us individually, remaining in solidarity elevates the issues facing our weakest members. We privileged PoC at MLS must try not to be self-indulgent and shed this responsibility.

Ideally, everyone would have an even playing field. We don’t. Well-integrated Asian people in the West have often been used to silence minority demands for equality. We are told that if Asians can do it then there must be nothing stopping us but our laziness.  The previous De Minimis article, “(Not) So Fresh Off the Boat” is instructive on how untrue this myth is.

Without solidarity, POC remain subjugated. Already, some hold up Asians as a model-minority, while simultaneously ridiculing them as poorly-endowed human calculators devoid of personality. No matter how hard we try to “integrate” Western societies don’t see us as equals. This was clear in how commentator Yassmin Abdel-Magied was attacked for daring to suggest that “lest we forget” shouldn’t only refer to white deaths, but also the horror of war and our complicity in its perpetuation in Palestine, Yemen, Syria, and in offshore detention. PoC in Australia must disown our heritage or be attacked as un-Australian. When we do, we are nevertheless reminded that we aren’t white. White Australians can question authority without being un-Australian. We can’t because we aren’t seen as fully Australian to begin with.

It may seem divisive, but focusing on race, as with women’s issues, works to address inequalities not enlarge them. Ignoring that we face racism isn’t a solution; if tomorrow we started pretending that unconscious bias doesn’t exist, women would not magically achieve pay parity.

Yes, different groups have different needs – the changes needed to achieve gender equality are not the same as those necessary for greater income equality. Focussing on class doesn’t address racism, nor fix gender issues – this is the importance of intersectionality. Its great insight is to allow issues to be seen through various lenses. It shows us that, while achieving equal pay for equal work is a worthy goal, it doesn’t help an unemployed trans person break stigma and find employment. It is not divisive to recognise these identities; until racism and sexism are gone, pretending they don’t exist simply ignores very real problems. We POC must lift up our communities rather than leaving the weakest to fend for themselves. We must not kick down the ladder once we are ascendant. Our privilege means we must do ever more.

​

Asad Kasim-Khan is a second-year JD student

More articles like this 
  • Dear White People of MLS
  • Stop Calling Me 'Person of Colour'

The rest of this issue
  • Running to the Finish Line
  • Limping Across the Finish Line​
  • Failing My Favourite Subject in Law School
  • Finding the 'I' in Anxiety
At least it was better than your last article
16/5/2017 12:39:59 pm

If it is possible to group a multitude of different races and skin colours under the term 'People of Colour' in the interests of solidarity, is it not logical to go the next step and include the only other race you have left out, white people, and all people of colour together under the term 'human'?

The inherent biases you say naturally exist should exist in no lesser extent between say, an Asian person and a Middle Eastwrn person, than they do between a white person and a non white person. If an Asian person and a middle eastern person can stand together in solidarity as 'people of colour' then white people and all people of colour can stand together in solidarity as 'human'

Anon
16/5/2017 07:16:14 pm

I can't tell if you're really good at satire, or wasting words where you could have just written #alllivesmatter

Superior intellect
16/5/2017 08:15:11 pm

Not an argument

Anon
16/5/2017 09:12:21 pm

Are you aware that the middle-east is part of Asia?

Nona
16/5/2017 10:26:56 pm

Are you aware that in Australian parlance, 'Asian' is not used to refer to everyone who lives in the continent of Asia?

When is the last time you heard the Russian population of Vladivostok described as 'Asian' because they live on the socially constructed continent of 'Asia'?

other anon
16/5/2017 08:03:26 pm

@at - THANK YOU for saying what every one is thinking with that heading

Wow
17/5/2017 03:29:20 pm

I was thinking "Keep calling him a person of colour?" .... "...weak tea colour?"

Tim
16/5/2017 08:06:23 pm

A thoughtful response, Asad.

Overall, though, I find this piece a more compelling argument for solidarity than one that is specifically convincing as to how the phrase 'person of colour' is a useful term in advocating for racial justice.

I do query whether being against the phrase 'person of colour' is really averse to such solidarity; if anything, I personally feel that it obfuscates the issue rather than clarifies it. Perhaps this is a helpful example.

Take two ways of phrasing the criticism of the lack of diversity of the board of a major company or NGO which is completely Caucasian:
1) "There aren't any people of colour on this board."
2) "There isn't a single non-white person on this board."

Now, this may seem like a minor, semantic difference - and it is, of course going to be, when we're debating the use of a phrase - but I do find the latter statement more powerful. The former statement, using the phrase 'colour' renders 'colour' as some tokenistic quality which will render the lack of diversity easier to swallow for the company photoshoot. Whereas the latter - which specifically addresses the issue; the overwhelming whiteness and lack of minorities on the decision-making body of said institution.

I think we're not especially likely to convince each other on the relative worth of the phrase "person of colour". But, I hope for something a little more reasonable than that; merely to indicate that those who do not like the phrase are not necessarily against racial solidarity; in fact, they may be strongly for it, but think that other phrases such as "non-white" actually lay bare the issues and direct the conversation far more succintly and convincingly where "person of colour" may serve to obfuscate and soften the blow of daring to speak about race.

Cheryle
18/5/2017 06:01:06 pm

Powerful comments

Kai
16/5/2017 10:50:14 pm

I find it interesting that, on the one hand, the experiences of Asians in Western society is used as an example of how we fail to integrate into White culture, and ultimately get treated as less equal in society than White people. You have, flatteringly, used my experiences as an example of how we have failed to fully integrate into society, and how we are still treated as some sort of subservient class.

And then, on the other hand, the example you have used in positive discrimination based on race (American Affirmative Action) is the one that detrimentally affects Asians more than any other official policy in the modern day United States. Indian and Asian students must routinely perform far beyond their White, Black and Latina colleagues in order to enter elite institutions. Consultants advise Asians to de-emphasise their Asian-ness (https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/06/asian-americans-and-the-future-of-affirmative-action/489023/) and when Colleges use race-blind methods to admit students, Asians tend to do much better (Just look at number of Asians at the UC campuses). The tendency of society to lump all Asians together as a single group tends to annihilate the chances of less-privileged South, and Southeast Asians too (http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21669595-asian-americans-are-united-states-most-successful-minority-they-are-complaining-ever).

This is the problem I see with lumping all non-white people together. Our experiences are different, and our problems are not the same. By grouping us all into one homogeneous mass, we are putting groups with oft competing and dissimilar goals and problems into the same camp, reducing nuance, and simplifying narratives beyond what they should be.

#Not your Asian sidekick
17/5/2017 09:34:06 am

This is a good point.

It's interesting to note that if race based affirmative action policies existed for MLS (It does exist but in limited form for indigenous people) it would certainly result in a significant decrease in Asian law students at this school, who are significantly over represented here.

Asian students should think about that before jumping on the next 'solidarity' train to pull out of Pelham St station.

agree
17/5/2017 03:25:52 pm

Excellent point Kai.


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    October 2022
    September 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12