De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

Why We're Wrong about Everything that Matters Most: J.S. Mill's 'Argument from Accident' in On Liberty

19/9/2017

 
The greatest difficulty for Mill, the herculean task over which he labours here and throughout On Liberty, is to convince his readers to consider that they could, possibly, be wrong. In my view, the strongest of these arguments is what I will call the 'argument from accident.'
Picture
To summarise:
  1. One is confident in one's beliefs if those beliefs are reinforced by their community;
  2. If one had been born into a community that reinforced contrary beliefs, one would be equally confident in those contrary beliefs instead;
  3. It is only an a-rational accident of history that one was born into the community they were born into;
  4. Confidence in any belief is only an a-rational accident of history.

Perhaps the argument carries little weight when applied to beliefs so absurd no-one has ever been recorded believing them, but where different communities have had radically different beliefs to our own, the argument is terrifyingly compelling.

Prima facie at least, the community of our university generally reinforces the following beliefs: that prejudice against anyone on the basis of their race or gender identity is evil, that pleasurable sex between consenting adults is good, and that something like liberal democracy is the most desirable form of government. That slavery might be acceptable, that 'a woman's place is in the home', that sex outside of monogamous heterosexual marriage is somehow unethical, or that we'd be better off ruled by a dictator – these are thoughts that would rarely even reach the level of controversy on campus; they do not appear to us as serious possibilities.

However, had we been born in first century Rome, we would have seen discrimination against women and slaves as simple common sense, had we been born in reformation England we would view 'deviant' sexuality as almost treasonous, and had we been born in feudal Japan democracy would have struck us as absurd. Our settled convictions, these thoughts which are, for us, impossible not to think, are simple accidents of history.

It is no answer to point to our reasons, even our scientific authorities; most people convinced of their own tribe and times' values will be able to adduce good reasons in support of them. Ironically, On Liberty's age strengthens its case on this point. Mill's example of an unassailable, undisputed truth is 'the Newtonian philosophy'; through the early part of the following century general relativity and quantum mechanics combined to show Newton as being, if not quite incorrect, then at least radically incomplete. Empiricism is no guarantee of truth: the limits of Newton's equations were largely unobservable because the anomalies were largely to small or too fast. Mill had good, empirical reasons, (not to mention the consensus of all serious scientists) to hold up Newton as unassailably correct. And yet in this he was wrong. Good, empirical reasons and the consensus of authorities are no guarantee of our comfortable certainties any more than they were of his.

The age of the text further serves to strengthen it in Mill's choice of the strongest opposing case: a belief in God and an afterlife. It was in defense of these beliefs, Mill felt, that his audience was least likely to be sympathetic to unrestricted freedom of expression: "To fight the battle on such ground gives a great advantage to an unfair antagonist; since he will be sure to say (and many who have no desire to be unfair will say it internally), Are these the doctrines [belief in God and an afterlife] which you do not deem sufficiently certain to be taken under the protection of law?" Mill's imaginary interlocutor echoes a popular objection against free speech in our own time: 'The only people who need the freedom to say racist things are racists.' It is rather shocking to read in Mill the assumption that his audience would view atheism as morally abhorrent as we view racism. And yet, apart from the accident of history that we are alive here and now, we might have felt the same.

​Ben Wilson is a third-year JD student

More by Ben:
  • I Want my Underpants on the Outside
  • ExamSoft Enthusiasm and Concerns
  • Nationalise the Profession

The rest of this Issue:

  • Does MLS Have a Collusion Problem
  • Reclaiming RU OK Day
  • Reflections on the LSS Elections​
  • Gym Memberships should be Covered by Tuition Fees
  • Negative Comments

Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12