De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

The Problem of Post-Modern Legal Discourse with David Foster Wallace

9/5/2017

 
NICK PARRY-JONES

Vol 11, Issue 10

In an interview,1 David Foster Wallace2 decried the influence of postmodernism on his generation. As a method of analysis, postmodernism doesn't prescribe an overarching framework of understanding. Instead all knowledge3 is contextual and constructed.  Thus proponents of postmodern art are self referential, ironic and cynical. When DFW gave this interview, the effects of 50 years of post-modernism were being felt across the art world.  An idea that reconstructed colonialism and gave credence to subaltern studies4 for academics, post-modern art had become it's truest form, a dry joke. While David was famously elitist on the question of TV,5 one cannot avoid the idea that Seinfeld was indeed cynical. Nothing was taken seriously. No problems were ever solved. As Larry David6 said “No hugging, no learning.”7

​
Picture
To Wallace, TV's shift to cynical and ironic humour was corrosive to the soul and thus the culture reflected in the screen. People learn from television, but on television, nobody learns. Characters are mocked for their inability to read a situation.

They fail. That's it. Just failure. Punishment.

But how does this relate to law?8 The essential element of postmodern deconstruction is its contextual basis of thought. Within these microscopic contexts, the more knowledgeable reign supreme. Those that are less so are punished accordingly and without delay. The same can be said for law. In the context of each legal process, one party is punished, forced to pay up big and ground out by technicalities, with little thought to overarching principles of how our society should be. The end result being a disjointed and cruel legal system, with each developing in a maze of its own, requiring some stiff9 in a thousand dollar suit to navigate.

But is there a solution to all this?10

Any student of Hayne's ‘Joining the Dots’ class  will know of his honour's conviction that law should not develop in silos. In saying this, the good Justice mirrors the argument of what is surely his favourite author.11 Wallace claims that to be “really human” we need to be “generally pathetic” and “unavoidably sentimental.” For those that tire of DFW's adverb-adjective style, look no further than Kirby J. Many of his decisions12 fight against this trend and implore his friends on the bench to adhere to principles he sees as core to our society: those of fairness, compassion and equality.

So next time you want to write a legal opinion essay on the black letter of the law, think of the world you build. Ask yourself WWDFWD?13

1 If you're on a computer, or an astute typist, find that here https://youtu.be/91ytSdSM-Kk
2 Author of Infinite Jest and bandanna aficionado.
3 And therefore, truth.

4 A field of historical discourse which focuses on the underclass as opposed to the rulers and recognised paragons of culture.​
5 
See: "E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction" (The Review of Contemporary Fiction, 1993).

6 Creator of Seinfeld and known post-modernist.
7 Francis Davis, “Recognition Humour,” The Atlantic Nov 1992.
8 I ask this as I assume this will be published in a law school weekly. Maybe you're reading this online, maybe you picked it off the floor to place it in a recycling bin. If the latter, then thank you for your service.
9 
Hopefully from Melbourne Law School.
10 
Yes, read on.
11
    ...of The Pale King.
12 Largely dissents.
13 What Would David Foster Wallace Do?





Nick Parry-Jones is a third-year JD student

More by NPJ
  • Pruning the root of all evil
  • Go8 Speaks; Calls Kettle Black
  • In Remembering Harrambe You Invoke the Spectre of Racism
  • The Art of Computer Programming Without Really Trying

The rest of this issue
  • Fares Fair PTV: Update
  • Who Gives a Crap? Parodying MLS Debates through the Prism of Privileged Pooping
  • Mary's Inspiration: Towards Exams​
  • Book Review: Grand History, Napoleon and Forgotten Ally
David Foster Wallace
11/5/2017 04:21:50 pm

Thanks bro


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    October 2022
    September 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12