De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

Home Crowd Derision

27/8/2019

 
Issue 5, Semester 2, 2019

EDGAR BOX

I’m not a fan of sport. In fact, I’m one of those people who finds contrarian pride in actively broadcasting how much they don’t like sport. I even pretend to not understand sport with my friends to boost my image as ‘the-anti-sport-guy.’ You know exactly the sort of person I’m talking about. Well, last weekend my friends took me to go and see a game of AFL; Essendon v Collingwood at the Melbourne Cricket Ground. Apparently, it was an important game — I wouldn’t know, or at least I’ll pretend not to, because there’s nothing cooler than people who don’t have fun. In any case, here is what I learned from the experience.
Picture
Image: Wikimedia Commons
Firstly, there is an absurdity to everybody arriving early to try beating everybody else for access to seats. Evidently, AFL fans are suffering under a non-Pareto optimal Nash Equilibrium, because they’re all arriving at 5:30pm to fight over non-reserved seating, only to then spend two hours staring at an empty field. For an eighty thousand strong crowd, this results in eighteen years of cumulatively wasted time. In terms of human lifespan squandered by showing up early, the 2018 AFL season — which had a total attendance figure of around seven and a half million — was the equivalent of murdering twenty-two people. If everybody agreed to only arrive and start jousting for space, say half an hour in advance, there would still be the same number of winners and losers, and we’d literally be saving lives. Attending an AFL game is an iterative event, so a stable cooperative strategy could be formed if we could just find a way to overcome the associated coordination problem. They should replace the half-time shows with game theory lectures.

Secondly, whilst the fans might be skipping the economics lessons, the food-stand operators are not. In order to gain an appropriate immersion in the cultural experience, I decided to sample some of the fine culinary delights on offer. However, the market captivity on display at the MCG makes the Porta Via† business model look like a paragon of anarcho-capitalism straight out of the fevered hallucinations of Murray Rothbard straight after snorting Ayn Rand’s collected works in powdered form. Fourteen dollars for a burger? Well, at least my chips had plenty of salt.

Thirdly, I was astounded at the level of roughhousing on display. I know this is a contact sport, but come now fellas, it’s just a game. At one point, I witnessed a gentlemen on the field push one of his colleagues in the chest! That’s not on, surely? I expected the umpires to descend upon this unsporting display with stern admonishments, yet this roguish behaviour went unchastised! I suppose it’s understandable — as my friends explained to me, all the umpires are inept louts who couldn’t be trusted to referee a game of solitaire. Unless Carlton is playing apparently. Then it’s not incompetence — it’s bias.

At the end of the game Collingwood won, because they footballed the most. The other team’s bold strategy, of not footballing as much, unfortunately did not pay off. If Essendon are in search of a coaching consultant, I am currently offering strategy sessions on my patented ‘kick-score-repeat’ method. ​

​Edgar is the pseudonym of a Second Year JD Student.
Joey Daniher
27/8/2019 06:46:13 pm

sPoRtSpEoPlE dOn'T sMaRt gUd!1!1 haha look at me I'm intelligent so don't waste my time watching sport, that's for the rabble! Cut the pretentiousness bud, knowing about game theory doesn't make you smart...

Neale daniher
27/8/2019 07:07:50 pm

Author opens with an obviously self-deprecating joke about being a person who pretends to not understand sport just for the image. Commenter mistakes tone for utter sincerity, and mocks a piece of satire. Second commenter mocks first commenter. Etc.

Anthony Daniher
27/8/2019 08:45:37 pm

Second commenter mistakes baiting by first commenter for utter sincerity. Third commenter derides mental incapacity of the second commenter.


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    October 2022
    September 2022
    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12