De Minimis
  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12

Application for a Low Income Health Care Card

14/3/2017

 
HENRY HAMILTON

Vol 11, Issue 3

​I receive a letter from Centrelink. It informs me that my low-income-health care-card is going to expire. My entitlement to concession public transport and medical care will expire with it. It also informs me that I can re-apply for my Low Income Health Care Card by merely filling out a form detailing any income I received over a specified 8 week period and attaching payslips as proof, plus miscellaneous other details. I have two weeks. I accept this opportunity.




I search through my bank statements, then note down the amounts I received from each employer under various categories in the form. It’s unclear whether contractor work done for the uni is ‘employment’ per se, so I put it down as ‘compensation’ in the form instead. All the earnings in these categories are aggregated into combined earnings that determine the claim, so surely the precise labels don’t matter. I then tell them how much I have in a savings account. I realise that almost none of my employers during the specified period have ever given me payslips though. The form does not inform me what to do about this. I collect what payslips I have, then prepare PDFs of bank statements from my everyday account to detail my other income. I accept that this is time consuming and annoying but the necessary price to pay.

I go into uni to access a scanner to scan the completed and signed form.The form says I can submit both it and supporting documentation online, using the document submission tool, but the online document submission tool doesn’t have a category for Low Income Health Care Card submission, nor do any of the more general categories seem to fit. I decide to submit via post. I print off the payslips and bank statements at uni. Centrelink have not supplied a paid return envelope though, and the post office where I could buy a stamped envelope is closed. The post office is only open from 9-5. I am interning 9-5 every day, and lunch-times are too busy to go to the post office to buy the stamped envelope to send the forms to get the Low Income Health Care Card to reacquire my concession. I eventually find a free lunchtime to make it down there, buy the stamped envelope, send the forms. I accept that this is now beyond my control.

After two and a half months of non-concession travel and healthcare I receive my first letter from Centrelink regarding my application. It informs me that my application for a Low Income Health Care Card has been rejected. No reasons are given. It helpfully suggests that I call the Youth and Students Line on 132490 if I have questions. I call the Youth and Students Line but my call is answered only by a dull beeping sound. My phone says that the line is busy. I try again, with the same results. I try again and again and again and again and again until on my 31st attempt I finally get to the automated phone menu. I state my Customer Reference Number to the computerised voice, reject it’s kind offer to consult the Centrelink website for my needs, and say ‘operator’ with what I hope is enough clarity to be placed in the queue to speak to a human. I accept that this will take some time.

I wait to speak to an operator, listening on speaker to the tinny classical hold music occasionally interrupted by the computerised voice’s veiled threats asking whether I am aware that Centrelink has partnered with the AFP to launch ‘Taskforce Integrity’ to crack down on false Centrelink reports. I am surprised and grateful when a human picks up in only 45 minutes. I explain my situation, and ask why my claim was rejected. The operator says that 1) I had completely failed to mention income I received from my internship, 2) I did not provide proof of the ‘compensation’ payouts I received from the uni, and 3) I did not provide bank statements for my savings account along with those for my regular account. I will have to reapply. I say that that ‘compensation’ was just contract work, and was detailed in the bank statements I provided, but the operator says that that isn’t really ‘compensation’, and that I will have to reapply with those earnings placed in the correct category. I tell him that no-one had paid money into my savings account, nor could they, but the operator insists that I will have to reapply with the bank statements attached. I accept that this call is not going anywhere.
​
I wonder how to go about reapplying, as the operator hadn’t provided any information about how to do so. I wonder whether I had actually earned any money from my internship in the period specified and, checking the dates, confirm that I had not. I wonder, given their apparent ability to double-check earnings using information from other sources, why they couldn’t just use those other sources to automate this application process. I wonder why they didn’t list the reasons for rejection in the rejection letter they sent. I wonder why they rejected the claim, restarting the entire process, instead of just requesting alterations and additional proof for the claim already made. I wonder how much more money I will spend on non-concession transport and healthcare during the however many more months it will take for me to reapply for a Low Income Health Care Card and for them to reassess said reapplication, keeping in mind that the next application may not be successful either. I wonder whether Centrelink is incompetent at being helpful, or extremely competent at being unhelpful. I wonder whether my feeling of frustrated exhaustion is the application’s unintended side-effect, or is exactly the state of mind the application process is calculated to produce. I wonder whether my Centrelink records will be disclosed to the media in retaliation for writing this. I wonder how much more of a nightmare this is for those with less English than I, less time than I, less privilege than I, less financial stability then I, less training in navigating kafkaesque bureaucracies than I, less ability to laugh this process off in social media and present-tense narrative pieces than I. And I wonder whether this can  be accepted and think ‘no’. No it can not. No.

Henry Hamilton is a fourth-year JD student



The rest of this issue
  • Application for a Low Income Health Care Card
  • Confessions of a Surreptitious Lecture Recorder
  • Fares Fair PTV
  • First Year Represent
  • The Heavy Hand of Modern China
​
Picture
Jacob
14/3/2017 03:53:13 pm

As insightful and poignant as ever, Henry.

Jimi
14/3/2017 09:16:57 pm

Gotta love the 'Link'! Great article

Raph
15/3/2017 04:41:56 pm

If you can't manage a Centrelink HCC application how did you make it to fourth year?

Henry HL
15/3/2017 10:54:55 pm

Excellent commentary, but a better question might be 'If someone who's made it to fourth year can't handle a Centrelink HCC application, who can?'

Raph
20/3/2017 12:56:51 am

Well, the multitude of low income Australians with average education seem to do ok at it.

It sounds like you weren't completely above board in your application. Better to be rejected than face the admission board with fraud on your record.

Henry HL
21/3/2017 10:19:49 am

Please be careful of carelessly throwing around accusations/implications of fraud, especially in the legal sector. I don't care myself, by there are some seriously trigger happy people around he who just jump at the possibility of a defamation suit.

Raph
21/3/2017 10:49:12 pm

The topic is of public interest. You are commenting on the administration of a government department and detailing your experience… which, to me, sounds like you think the whole Centrelink administration and application process is beneath you by virtue of your admirable position as an enlightened fourth year.

It also sounds like you didn’t bother to read the requirements or care to do so before submitting the forms because you were simply too busy and you felt that you’d done enough and Centrelink should just give you a concession card.

It’s unfortunate that you had to work from 9 to 5. It’s disgraceful that Centrelink didn’t gift you a return postage envelope so you could just pop your failed application in the post box at your convenience. Oh calamity! It’s out of your control, but you accepted it and moved on. Well done.

Two and a half months of non-concession travel must be simply life destroying as you commute to your internship and check bank statements from various employers.

Centrelink takes fraud very seriously, and so does the admission board. I implore you to be careful in your dealings with Centrelink lest you inadvertently need to answer a tough question and your four years of the illustrious JD is being weighed against a 50% fare discount you could probably do without...

Is it not fair comment to express my honest opinion that it IS better to be rejected than inadvertently commit welfare fraud because you were reckless in filling out the form with your cavalier attitude. ‘so surely the precise labels don’t matter’… sorry, turns out they do.

Would you prefer a system without checks and balances?

Our welfare system is GREAT. It’s also very complex and meets the needs of many people. It’s the supportive ‘other’ that many people lack, without which this country would be a lot worse off.

So, before you slag off the system that supports struggling Australians and others, perhaps you should check your privilege.

Seriously, trigger happy people might just jump at the possibility of a defamation suit. Lucky I didn’t comment on their stuff… and you said, ‘I don’t care’.

I see the new comment policy… and that this may be deleted and my details passed on in the case of a defamation suit. Oh WOE.

Henry HL
21/3/2017 11:46:42 pm

"Our welfare system is GREAT. It’s also very complex and meets the needs of many people. It’s the supportive ‘other’ that many people lack, without which this country would be a lot worse off.

So, before you slag off the system that supports struggling Australians and others, perhaps you should check your privilege."

You do read the news, right?

Henry HL
21/3/2017 11:51:56 pm

Attn Moderators

I want Raph's comments to remain on this page for as long as is humanly possible, preferably even against his wishes once he re-reads them in a calmer state of mind.

David
7/2/2018 06:28:58 pm

Old article. But..Raph had obviously never had substantive dealings with Centrelink while in financial and likely emotional distress.

I'll go out on a limb and say never been in actual "which utility am I going to pay this month", and "I cant afford a train to the supermarket *and* buy food" financial distress.

It you're applying for a low income health care card, your financial situation is, at best, perilous. Waiting 2.5 months means you miss out on

Lower copay on your medications, which you're more likely to need.

Discounted public transport (and you can't afford a car)

Bulk billing at many doctors offices, without the humiliation of needing to beg for it.

Discounted energy bills

Etc.

Some of these may seem small to you, but when every $2 coin is valuable for essentials, they're far from trivial.

This isn't crackdown on fraud, this is abuse of the disadvantaged. In some cases the documentation requirements are only made clear after waiting 2 months for a rejection. In other cases they are actually misrepresented during the application process.

Don't get me started on why, given proof of citizenship, they need to know the date (which they've been told before) I first entered the country over 35 years ago, or every period, (outside the qualification period) IveI resided outside the country. Ever. (never, if you're going to say something, but why is where I may have lived as a child important?)

Don't make assumptions, and don't get self righteous about process with which you are not familiar.

I'd hazard that many who qualify for the low income health care don't get it. If you're on Newstart or DSP its more or less automatic. If you're not, it's an extended nightmare.

Our welfare system is better than some, but that's a very low bar. There are few that it serves well, any more . Which doesn't serve anyone well, except certain politicians looking for scapegoats and divisive issues for an election campaign.


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    December 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • ABOUT US
  • Podcast
  • Your Learned Friend
  • Anonymous Feedback
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • Constitution
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12