De Minimis
  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • ABOUT US
  • Comment Policy
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
  • Blog

The seven stages of clerkships

5/10/2015

 
CLARKE SHIPLEY
Volume 8, Issue 8
The clerkship process is, in one sense, a LIV coordinated route for getting an internship in corporate law. In another (more accurate?) sense, it’s a grueling psychological marathon designed to weed out those with any faint candle of life still flickering within. It’s probably both. Except that the first sense is a faint possibility, and the second is a given.
Anyway, the defining aspect of the whole process is, one could argue, grief. And some people smarter than me have formulated stages of grief. And maybe applying that framework to clerkships would be valuable, or at least stop me from doing Corps readings. So here goes.*
 
1. Shock or Disbelief
 
The moment when that rejection email first gets opened.
 
“Allensons rejected me!!!!!????!!!!???!!!!????”
 
“Wait. I must be dreaming. Or hallucinating. I have had nightmares about this before. Stay calm. Pinch yourself”
 
2. Denial
 
The time spent either a) denying that the prolonged silence you’re getting means rejection, or b) denying that the rejection you got was real.
 
“I probably put down both the wrong number and email in my application, I’d better check all of my applications to make sure. Nope, hmmmmm. Maybe my phone just isn’t receiving calls. Someone call my phone!  *phone rings* Wait, Google obviously just isn’t letting emails through to my account…”
 
“Well, someone in HR’s gonna get fired over this. Sent this to the wrong email, fell asleep on the job etc. I hate to do this, but I’d better call to sort out this terrible mistake. Hahahah, I sure as hell wouldn’t want to be those guys!”
 
3. Anger
 
Self-explanatory.
 
“Fuck this.” *Throws phone across room*
 
“You can’t fire me because I quit! And, I guess, because you never hired me.”
 
4. Bargaining
 
“If I call HR and offer to do one for free, will that bump me up a few places? Hmmmm, it’s a shame that Adelaide place selling grad positions for $20K got shut down.”
 
“What if I offered you my soul in exchange for a clerkship? Oh, you’d be taking that anyway…”
 
5. Guilt
 
Incidentally, this period of guilt is a lot shorter than the gnawing, ever-present guilt you would probably feel working in corporate law.
 
“They don’t want me defending asbestos, tobacco and coal companies for them. I am a terrible person.”
 
“I should have spent less time convincing myself to sell out, and more time actually selling out. Or maybe just less time convincing myself to sell out.”
 
6. Depression
 
Also self-explanatory.
 
“Fuck this.” *Throws textbooks across room*
 
“I mean, I was going to leave to go to the bar after two years of experience/networking. And now I can’t even do that.”
 
7. Acceptance and Hope
 
The moment when you realise that this is probably a good thing.
 
“Well, I suppose some HR rep saw into my soul, figured I was the sort of person who with enough integrity/morality/self-respect to hate this and drop out within a year, so decided against investing thousands of dollars training me. That’s sort of a compliment.”
 
“Well, I suppose I still go do that idealistic/interesting thing I entered into law school hoping to do. Wow, I feel better already. Wait, why was I applying for corporate law positions!?” I think I just felt my projected quality of life go up. Like, physically felt it. It felt good.”
 
*Note that these opinions are purely those of the author, and, in some cases, not even the author’s opinion. Also, this is public on the internet, isn’t it? Shit. If any HR reps are reading this, know who wrote it, and are considering said person’s application, I would advise you (yes you, HR rep) to disregard any/all of these opinions that would imply any critique of corporate law whatsoever. Maybe just ignore all of it. That’s safest.

 
Clarke Shipley is a second-year JD student.
Picture
Photo credit: Clerk Kent (wikimedia commons)
Jonathan Tuckworth
6/10/2015 06:02:48 pm

Is every article in de minimis edited to sure it has the exact right blend of the modern journalistic self-aware writer's voice and self-deprecating law-related humour? Or is it just a coincidence?

Duncan Wallace
7/10/2015 02:47:44 pm

Write an article for us which doesn't have these traits and find out...


Comments are closed.
    Picture

    Archives

    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014

  • Home
  • Podcast
  • Art
  • Get published!
  • ABOUT US
  • Comment Policy
  • Archive
    • 2018
    • 2017
    • 2017 >
      • Semester 2 (Volume 12) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (election issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
    • 2016 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 9) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 10) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8 (Election Issue)
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
        • Issue 13 (test)
    • 2015 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 7) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
      • Semester 2 (Volume 8) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
    • 2014 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 5) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
      • Semester 2 (Volume 6) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 12
    • 2013 >
      • Issue 1
      • Issue 2
      • Issue 3
      • Issue 4
      • Issue 5
      • Issue 6
    • 2012 >
      • Semester 1 (Volume 1) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
      • Semester 2 (Volume 2) >
        • Issue 1
        • Issue 2
        • Issue 3
        • Issue 4
        • Issue 5
        • Issue 6
        • Issue 7
        • Issue 8
        • Issue 9
        • Issue 10
        • Issue 11
        • Issue 12
  • Blog